It's me again. The team is asking for the additional information, especially when do you see this error. Could you please share the details, so we can investigate it further?

What happened this run: • STEP 1 — all three source files materialized and verified against their SHA-256 hashes exactly; py_compile passed. Code is authentic and was not modified. • STEP 2 — key doc found (single match, newest) and the key loaded into reply_api_key.txt (24 chars, single line). Never printed. • STEP 3 — python3 watchdog_mini.py ran but exited 3 at the first API call. The egress proxy rejects every HTTPS CONNECT to api.reply.io with 403. I confirmed this independently and checked the proxy status endpoint; the README classifies 403 as a policy/egress denial to be reported, not retried or routed around — so I did neither, and did not fall back to the Reply MCP connector (forbidden by the hard rules). No Reply data was pulled; no watch_result.json/watch_digest.md were produced. • STEP 4b — run-ledger heartbeat doc written to Drive: Aexus_ReplyWatch_run_20260911_0913 with exit: "WATCHDOG FAILED: ...". Drive is reachable. • STEP 5 — no digest to write (run failed before producing one); skipped. Context from the run ledgers: the watchdog last succeeded at 17:09 UTC on Sep 10 (real=2, exit ok). Both runs since — 05:16 and 09:13 UTC on Sep 11 — failed with the identical egress block, so it's a standing outage, not a transient blip. It will keep failing on the 2-hour cadence until api.reply.io is allow-listed for this cloud session's egress policy, or the task is bound to a machine/environment that can reach Reply.